Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Choosing supplementary markers in forensic casework.

Forensic science international. Genetics - 1 Nov 2014

Tillmar Andreas O, Mostad Petter

Abstract excerpt

The vast majority of human familial identifications based on DNA end up with a well founded conclusion, normally using a standard set of genetic short tandem repeat (STR) loci. There are, however, a proportion of cases that show ambiguous results. For such occasions a number of different supplementary markers could be typed in order to gain further information. There are numerous markers available for such...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Decision Making
Share to Gene Frequency
Share to Genetic Markers

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to INDEL Mutation

Share to Likelihood Functions

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to Paternity

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 25113577
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.06.019

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Choosing supplementary markers in forensic casework.PMID 25113577Read ↗

Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

SNPs and STRs in forensic medicine. A strategy for kinship evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reinvestigations of six unusual paternity cases by typing of autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Addresing complex kinship and incidental findings in MPI/DVI databases Using SNPs Panels to Strengthen Casework Reporting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigative genetic genealogy: Current methods, knowledge and practice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dense single nucleotide polymorphism testing revolutionizes scope and degree of certainty for source attribution in forensic investigations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Kinship assignment with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit: Sources of error in simulated and real cases.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases. Selecting the most probable pedigree.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing paternities with inconclusive STR results: The suitability of bi-allelic markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.