Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Demographic and Experiential Correlates of Public Attitudes Towards Cell‐Free Fetal DNA Screening

7 Apr 2014

Abstract excerpt

This study seeks to inform clinical application of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening as a novel method for prenatal trisomy detection by investigating public attitudes towards this technology and demographic and experiential characteristics related to these attitudes. Two versions of a 25-item survey assessing interest in cffDNA and existing first-trimester combined screening for either trisomy 13 and 18 or...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Share to Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24715419
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9704-9

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Demographic and Experiential Correlates of Public Attitudes Towards Cell‐Free Fetal DNA ScreeningPMID 24715419Read ↗

Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

<scp>UK NHS</scp> pilot study on cell‐free <scp>DNA</scp> testing in screening for fetal trisomies: factors affecting uptakeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cell‐free fetal DNA testing: a pilot study of obstetric healthcare provider attitudes toward clinical implementationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Decisional regret in women receiving high risk or inconclusive prenatal cell-free DNA screening resultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnant couples’ attitude toward extended pre-conceptional genomic screeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public viewpoints on new non-invasive prenatal genetic testsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preferences regarding contemporary prenatal genetic tests among women desiring testing: implications for optimal testing strategiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Study of Public AttitudesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic Counselors’ Experience with Cell‐Free Fetal DNA Testing as a Prenatal Screening Option for AneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

A cross‐country comparison of pregnant women's decision‐making and perspectives when opting for non‐invasive prenatal testing in the Netherlands and BelgiumSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnant Women's Perspectives on Expanded Carrier ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.