Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: updated recommendations on diagnosis and classification.

doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.903

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Back to search

Article

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: updated recommendations on diagnosis and classification.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology - 1 Jun 2014

Fine Jo-David, Bruckner-Tuderman Leena, Eady Robin A J, Bauer Eugene A, Bauer Johann W, Has Cristina, Heagerty Adrian, Hintner Helmut, Hovnanian Alain, Jonkman Marcel F, Leigh Irene, Marinkovich M Peter, Martinez Anna E, McGrath John A, Mellerio Jemima E, Moss Celia, Murrell Dedee F, Shimizu Hiroshi, Uitto Jouni, Woodley David, Zambruno Giovanna

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Several new targeted genes and clinical subtypes have been identified since publication in 2008 of the report of the last international consensus meeting on diagnosis and classification of epidermolysis bullosa (EB). As a correlate, new clinical manifestations have been seen in several subtypes previously described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to arrive at an updated consensus on the classification of EB...

Topics

Consensus
Epidermolysis Bullosa
Female
Gene Expression Regulation
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Humans
Incidence
Male
Prognosis

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Sensitivity and Specificity

Severity of Illness Index

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 24690439
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.903

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 30 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.