Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature review

16 Sept 2013

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: To assess how often harm is quantified in randomised trials of cancer screening. DESIGN: Two authors independently extracted data on harms from randomised cancer screening trials. Binary outcomes were described as proportions and continuous outcomes with medians and interquartile ranges. DATA SOURCES: For cancer screening previously assessed in a Cochrane review, we identified trials from their...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Share to Global Cancer Incidence and Screening

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24041703
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f5334

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature reviewPMID 24041703Read ↗

Statistics review 11: assessing risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Health Technology Assessment of Diagnostic Tests: A state of the art review of methods guidance from international organisationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selection bias risk in “low bias” (RoB 2) rated randomised control trials (Preprint)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of General Health Checks in Adults: A Systematic ReviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recall bias in population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer and genital talc use: potential impact and quantitative bias analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recall bias in population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer and genital talc use: potential impact and quantitative bias analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Risk of Bias in Clinical Psychology Meta-Analyses (2000-2020): An OverviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Lack of precision in the reporting of sex and gender in cancer clinical trials with a PRO endpoint: a systematic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Invisible Harms, Visible Benefits? Adverse Event Reporting in Physical Activity Interventions for Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Meta-analysis and Critical AppraisalSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer Screening, Surrogates of Survival, and the SomaSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.