Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population.

BMC genetics - 8 Nov 2012

Neves Haroldo H R, Carvalheiro Roberto, Queiroz Sandra A

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: The availability of high-density panels of SNP markers has opened new perspectives for marker-assisted selection strategies, such that genotypes for these markers are used to predict the genetic merit of selection candidates. Because the number of markers is often much larger than the number of phenotypes, marker effect estimation is not a trivial task. The objective of this research was to compare...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Genome
Share to Genomics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Share to Selection, Genetic

Share to Statistics as Topic

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 23134637
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-100
PMCID: PMC3563460

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population.PMID 23134637Read ↗

LASSO with cross-validation for genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of genomic selection in mice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of genotype imputation on genome-enabled prediction of complex traits: an empirical study with mice data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficiency of genomic selection using Bayesian multi-marker models for traits selected to reflect a wide range of heritabilities and frequencies of detected quantitative traits loci in mice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accounting for genetic architecture for body weight improves accuracy of predicting breeding values in a commercial line of broilers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adding gene transcripts into genomic prediction improves accuracy and reveals sampling time dependence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction performance of linear models and gradient boosting machine on complex phenotypes in outbred mice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric methods in genomic evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive assessment of single-step BLUP with linear and non-linear similarity RKHS kernels: A case study in chickens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.