Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics - 1 Jul 2012

Kaphingst Kimberly A, McBride Colleen M, Wade Christopher, Alford Sharon Hensley, Reid Robert, Larson Eric, Baxevanis Andreas D, Brody Lawrence C

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: Examination of patients' responses to direct-to-consumer genetic susceptibility tests is needed to inform clinical practice. This study examined patients' recall and interpretation of, and responses to, genetic susceptibility test results provided directly by mail. METHODS: This observational study had three prospective assessments (before testing, 10 days after receiving results, and 3 months later)....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Comprehension
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Share to Linear Models

Share to Mental Recall

Share to Multivariate Analysis

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 22481132
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.22
PMCID: PMC3417078

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.PMID 22481132Read ↗

Factors Associated With Inaccurate Recall of Inherited Cancer Genetic Test Results Among Individuals With Germline Pathogenic Variants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consumers' use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Outcomes from a Novel Approach to Studying Consumer Genetic Testing for Germline Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patient beliefs and behaviors about genomic risk for type 2 diabetes: implications for prevention.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing on Patient and Provider.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' understanding of genetic susceptibility testing in mainstream medicine: qualitative study on thrombophilia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic risk profiling: attitudes and use in personal and clinical care of primary care physicians who offer risk profiling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Why do people seek out polygenic risk scores for complex disorders, and how do they understand and react to results?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of resultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.