Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Patients' understanding of genetic susceptibility testing in mainstream medicine: qualitative study on thrombophilia.

BMC health services research - 12 Jun 2007

Saukko Paula M, Ellard Sian, Richards Suzanne H, Shepherd Maggie H, Campbell John L

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: UK and US policy initiatives have suggested that, in the future, patients and clinicians in mainstream medicine could use genetic information to prevent common illnesses. There are no studies on patients' experience and understanding of the process of testing for common genetic suscep...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Factor V
Share to Genetic Counseling
Share to Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Interviews as Topic

Share to Patient Education as Topic

Share to Thrombophilia

Share to United Kingdom

Share to Venous Thrombosis

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 17565670
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-82
PMCID: PMC1906766

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-17565670-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Patients' understanding of genetic susceptibility testing in mainstream medicine: qualitative study on thrombophilia.PMID 17565670Read ↗

Are genetic tests exceptional? Lessons from a qualitative study on thrombophilia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Public perspectives on healthcare professional-directed communication of hereditary genetic risks: a mixed-method systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

UK-based mental health professionals’ perceptions of genetic and environmental risk for psychiatric conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic susceptibility in practice: The regulatory trajectory of non-rare thrombophilia (NRT) genetic tests in the clinical management of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic susceptibility-testing and pregnancy: something old, something new.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Susceptibility genetics of common conditions in clinical practice].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

GP attitudes to and expectations for providing personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Self-assessed knowledge of genomic medicine among non-genetics physicians – results from a nationwide Swedish surveySemantic proximity Read ↗

Patient understanding of genetic principles and their expectations of genetic services within the NHS: a qualitative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genomic era and perceptions of psychotic disorders: genetic risk estimation, associations with reproductive decisions and views about predictive testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.