Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison between direct sequencing and INNO-LiPA methods for HPV detection and genotyping in Thai Women.

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP - 1 Jan 2011

Chinchai Teeraporn, Chansaenroj Jira, Junyangdikul Pairoj, Swangvaree Sukumarn, Karalak Anant, Niruthisard Somchai, Poovorawan Yong

Abstract excerpt

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) have been recognized as etiologic factors in cervical carcinoma and several other anogenital cancers in females and males. HPV are classified as low risk (LR), probable high risk and high risk (HR) on the basis of their oncogenic potential. HPV genotypes, which are crucial for diagnosis and relationship with carcinogenesis, have been determined by several genotyping methods. In this...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cervix Uteri
Share to Genotyping Techniques

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Papillomaviridae

Share to Papillomavirus Infections

Share to Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to Thailand

Share to Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21790239

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison between direct sequencing and INNO-LiPA methods for HPV detection and genotyping in Thai Women.PMID 21790239Read ↗

Comparison of Four Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Methods: Next-generation Sequencing, INNO-LiPA, Electrochemical DNA Chip, and Nested-PCR.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison between two human papillomavirus genotyping assays targeting the L1 or E6/E7 region in cervical cancer biopsies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

HPV genotyping in cervical cancer in Northern Thailand: adapting the linear array HPV assay for use on paraffin-embedded tissue.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of the New INNO-LiPA HPV extra to genotype human papillomavirus in cervical cell specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of AMPLICOR and Hybrid Capture II assays for high risk HPV detection in normal and abnormal liquid-based cytology: use of INNO-LiPA Genotyping assay to screen the discordant results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotyping for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18/52/58 Has a Higher Performance than HPV16/18 Genotyping in Triaging Women with Positive High-risk HPV Test in Northern Thailand.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping v2 with PCR product subcloning and sequencing for identification of genital human papillomavirus genotypes in African women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the SPF10-INNO LiPA human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping test and the roche linear array HPV genotyping test.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prevalence and genotypes of human papillomavirus among Thai women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the INNO-LiPA and PapType assays for detection of human papillomavirus in archival vulva dysplasia and/or neoplasia tissue biopsy specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Human papillomavirus genotypes among infected Thai women with different cytological findings by analysis of E1 genes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping using commercial assays based on PCR and reverse hybridization methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.