Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of the INNO-LiPA and PapType assays for detection of human papillomavirus in archival vulva dysplasia and/or neoplasia tissue biopsy specimens.

Journal of clinical microbiology - 1 Nov 2011

Tan Sarah E, Garland Suzanne M, Rumbold Alice R, Tabrizi Sepehr N

Abstract excerpt

INNO-LiPA and PapType human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assays were compared for detection of HPV genotypes on archival vulvar tissue. The INNO-LiPA assay detected 49 HPV-16 infections, compared with 47 detected by the PapType assay. The INNO-LiPA assay detected amplifiable DNA in 59 (91%) biopsy specimens, compared with 57 (88%) specimens for which amplifiable DNA was detected by the PapType assay. The two...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biopsy
Share to Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Papillomaviridae

Share to Papillomavirus Infections

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to Virology

Share to Vulvar Neoplasms

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 21940480
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00516-11
PMCID: PMC3209107

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of the INNO-LiPA and PapType assays for detection of human papillomavirus in archival vulva dysplasia and/or neoplasia tissue biopsy specimens.PMID 21940480Read ↗

Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Using Archival Vulval Dysplastic or Neoplastic Biopsy Tissues: Comparison between the INNO-LiPA and Linear Array AssaysSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Real-Time Multiplex Human Papillomavirus (HPV) PCR Assays with INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra AssaySemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the SPF10-INNO LiPA human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping test and the roche linear array HPV genotyping test.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison between two human papillomavirus genotyping assays targeting the L1 or E6/E7 region in cervical cancer biopsies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detection of HPV DNA in paraffin-embedded cervical samples: a comparison of four genotyping methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of INNO-LiPA genotyping extra and hybrid capture 2 assays for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of the New INNO-LiPA HPV extra to genotype human papillomavirus in cervical cell specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Analytical performance of Cervista HPV 16/18 genotyping test for cervical cytology samples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the clinical performance of OmniPlex-HPV and GeneFinder HPV for the detection and genotyping of human papillomaviruses in cervical specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Four Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Methods: Next-generation Sequencing, INNO-LiPA, Electrochemical DNA Chip, and Nested-PCR.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of HPV sign genotyping test with INNO-LiPA HPV genotyping extra assay on histologic and cytologic cervical specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of 2 line blot assays for defining HPV genotypes in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.