Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The use of family history questionnaires: an examination of genetic risk estimates and genetic testing eligibility in the non-responder population.

Journal of genetic counseling - 1 Aug 2011

Armel Susan Randall, Hitchman Kara, Millar Kathryn, Zahavich Laura, Demsky Rochelle, Murphy Joan, Rosen Barry

Abstract excerpt

The use of mailed family history questionnaires (FHQs) has previously been established to be an effective method for obtaining family history information for the triage of patients for genetic counseling and genetic testing of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome; yet only 53% of patients complete their FHQ within 6 months from the date of mailing (Armel et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Aged, 80 and over

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Medical History Taking

Share to Risk Assessment

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21448763
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9359-8

Genes

BRCA1
BRCA2

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The use of family history questionnaires: an examination of genetic risk estimates and genetic testing eligibility in the non-responder population.PMID 21448763Read ↗

Why do women not return family history forms when referred to breast cancer genetics services? A mixed-method study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predictors of enrollment into a familial cancer registry by individuals at high risk for BRCA1/2.Semantic proximity Read ↗

"For all my family's sake, I should go and find out": an Australian report on genetic counseling and testing uptake in individuals at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effectiveness of family history questionnaires in cancer genetic counseling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the number of potential family members eligible for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in a "Traceback" approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adherence to Recommended Risk Management among Unaffected Women with a BRCA Mutation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent, participation in, and withdrawal from a population based cohort study involving genetic analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

A family history questionnaire improves detection of women at risk for hereditary gynecologic cancer: a pilot study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The relative accuracy of a questionnaire compared with pedigree analysis in genetic risk assessment for infertility.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patient and medical barriers preclude uptake of tamoxifen preventative therapy in women with a strong family history.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adequacy of family history taking in ovarian cancer patients: a population-based study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.