Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now?

1 Sept 2008

Abstract excerpt

Given that the majority of failed implantations and early pregnancies reasonably may be attributed to embryo aneuploidy, the logical foundation for the use of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) seems undeniably sound. If abnormal embryos having no implantation or advanced developmental potential can be identified accurately and excluded, and if only normal, euploid...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
Share to Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 19015133
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den400

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now?PMID 19015133Read ↗

What next for preimplantation genetic screening?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British Fertility Society Policy and Practice GuidelinesSemantic proximity Read ↗

We have reached a dead end for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium steering committeeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Role of Preimplantation genetic testing in Indian women with advanced maternal age to optimize Reproductive OutcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Patients’ Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M)Semantic proximity Read ↗

No beneficial effect of preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age with a high risk for embryonic aneuploidySemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled studySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.