Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group

1 Jan 2009

Abstract excerpt

The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative, established by the National Office of Public Health Genomics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, supports the development and implementation of a rigorous, evidence-based process for evaluating genetic tests and other genomic applications for clinical and public health practice in the United States. An...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research
Share to Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18813139
DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318184137c

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working GroupPMID 18813139Read ↗

Genomics in Public Health: Perspective from the Office of Public Health Genomics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Semantic proximity Read ↗

A collaborative translational research framework for evaluating and implementing the appropriate use of human genome sequencing to improve healthSemantic proximity Read ↗

Outcomes of interest in evidence-based evaluations of genetic tests.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic screening of the general adult population: key concepts for assessing net benefit with systematic evidence reviews.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Implementing genomic screening in diverse populationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Response to “The use of ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)”Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomics, Health Care, and SocietySemantic proximity Read ↗

DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technology-Driven and Evidence-Based Genomic Analysis for Integrated Pediatric and Prenatal Genetics EvaluationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Points to consider in the reevaluation and reanalysis of genomic test results: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: does genomic profiling to assess type 2 diabetes risk improve health outcomes?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.