Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Evidence for a relationship between mentalising deficits and paranoia over the psychosis continuum.

Schizophrenia research - 1 Feb 2008

Versmissen Dagmar, Janssen Ilse, Myin-Germeys Inez, Mengelers Ron, Campo Joost A, van Os Jim, Krabbendam Lydia

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: Failing of mentalising has been suggested to underlie certain symptoms of psychosis. An as yet unresolved issue is whether mentalising deficits reflect a characteristic which can also be detected in people at risk for psychosis or people with evidence of subclinical expression of psychosis. This study wanted to assess an aspect of mentalising in four groups with different levels of psychosis...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Comprehension
Share to Cues
Share to Delusions

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Hallucinations

Share to Interpersonal Relations

Share to Problem Solving

Share to Psychometrics

Share to Speech Perception

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17936589
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.09.024

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Evidence for a relationship between mentalising deficits and paranoia over the psychosis continuum.PMID 17936589Read ↗

Cognitive alterations in groups at risk for psychosis: neutral markers of genetic risk or indicators of social disability?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing sub-clinical psychosis phenotypes in the general population--a multidimensional approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The association between aberrant salience and psychotic experiences in general population twins, and genetic vulnerability as a modifier.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Self-monitoring as a familial vulnerability marker for psychosis: an analysis of patients, unaffected siblings and healthy controls.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Self-reported psychosis-like symptoms and the continuum of psychosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The validity of Psychosis Proneness Scales as vulnerability indicators in recent-onset schizophrenia patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The association between aberrant salience and psychotic experiences in general population twins, and genetic vulnerability as a modifier.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychosis and savouringSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reasoning bias, working memory performance and a transdiagnostic phenotype of affective disturbances and psychotic experiences in the general population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Social cognition and neurocognition as independent domains in psychosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Subjective experience of cognitive failures as possible risk factor for negative symptoms of psychosis in the general population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening the community for individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.