Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

An assessment of written patient information provided at the genetic clinic and relating to genetic testing in seven European countries.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG - 1 Oct 2007

Lewis Celine, Mehta Pritti, Kent Alastair, Skirton Heather, Coviello Domenico

Abstract excerpt

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of written information for patients and families about genetic testing, from a range of European countries. Written information relating to genetic testing for five conditions was gathered from genetic departments across seven European countries. Written information for each condition from each country was randomly chosen for assessment. Fourteen key issues had been...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Disclosure
Share to Europe

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Patient Education as Topic

Share to Risk Factors

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17568389
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201874

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

An assessment of written patient information provided at the genetic clinic and relating to genetic testing in seven European countries.PMID 17568389Read ↗

Application of a framework to guide genetic testing communication across clinical indicationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Communicating genetic information in families – a review of guidelines and position papersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Information and genetic counselling for psychiatric risks in children with rare disordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Public perspectives on healthcare professional-directed communication of hereditary genetic risks: a mixed-method systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Not all information is equally important: informed consent to genetic testing for hereditary cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counsellingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical GeneticistsSemantic proximity Read ↗

How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Self-assessed knowledge of genomic medicine among non-genetics physicians – results from a nationwide Swedish surveySemantic proximity Read ↗

Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.