Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening

3 Apr 2003

Abstract excerpt

Abstract Objectives: To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability of conventional cervical smear tests, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus testing for screening for cervical cancer. Design: Cross sectional study in which the three techniques were performed simultaneously with a reference standard (colposcopy and histology). Setting: Public university and private practices in...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Share to Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Share to Women's cancer prevention and management

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12676841
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.733

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screeningPMID 12676841Read ↗

HPV-genotyping versus conventional cervical cytology as a screening method to detect dysplastic cervical epithelial changes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening for cervical cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

HPV genotyping and p16/Ki-67 test significantly improve detection rate of high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesionSemantic proximity Read ↗

p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotypingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Linear array genotyping and hybrid capture II assay in detecting human papillomavirus genotypes in women referred for colposcopy due to abnormal Papanicolaou smear.Semantic proximity Read ↗

HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implicationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of 225 cases of cervical glandular lesions from the Papanicolaou test to total hysterectomySemantic proximity Read ↗

2013 Statement on Human Papillomavirus DNA Test UtilizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cervical cancer screening: Impact of collection technique on human papillomavirus detection and genotypingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Extended HPV genotyping and dual stain for the triage of primary HPV screen-positive cases: Practical guidance for the cytopathology laboratory.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.