Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Likelihood of attending bowel screening after a negative genetic test result: the possible influence of health professionals.

Genetic testing - 1 Jan 2002

Michie Susan, Collins Veronica, Halliday Jane, Marteau Theresa M

Abstract excerpt

This study was undertaken to determine the extent to which the reported likelihood of attending future bowel screening following negative genetic testing results for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) varies between the type of health professional providing care and the country of testing. The study subjects were 103 unaffected adults at risk for FAP who received negative results following predictive DNA...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adenomatous Polyposis Coli
Share to Australia

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Colonoscopy

Share to FAP gene

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to United Kingdom

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12537655
DOI: 10.1089/10906570260471840

Genes

FAP

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Likelihood of attending bowel screening after a negative genetic test result: the possible influence of health professionals.PMID 12537655Read ↗

Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic consultations in primary care: GPs' responses to three scenarios.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Family communication, genetic testing and colonoscopy screening in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer: a qualitative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of family history of colorectal cancer in primary care: perceptions of first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic predictive testing for bowel cancer predisposition: the impact on the individual.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comprehension of cancer risk one and 12 months after predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parental attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions about genetic testing for FAP and colorectal cancer surveillance in minors.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' and professionals' opinions of services for people at an increased risk of colorectal cancer: an exploratory qualitative study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of genetic outreach education and support to primary care on practitioner's confidence and competence in dealing with familial cancers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Who Should Provide Persons with Familial Risk of Colorectal Cancer with Information on Early Detection? - The View of those Affected].Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.