Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A - 15 Jun 2003

Michie Susan, Smith Jonathan A, Senior Victoria, Marteau Theresa M

Abstract excerpt

A proportion of those receiving negative results following predictive genetic testing desire future bowel screening. This is despite a negative result meaning a general population risk of 1:7500 and despite bowel screening being experienced as aversive and clinically unnecessary. This study aimed...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adenomatous Polyposis Coli
Share to Adolescent
Share to Genes, APC

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Predictive Value of Tests

Share to United Kingdom

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12784302
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20200

Genes

FAP

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-12784302-2026-09-01.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-01.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure.PMID 12784302Read ↗

Likelihood of attending bowel screening after a negative genetic test result: the possible influence of health professionals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Explanations of risk in families without identified mutations for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

"You're one of us now": young people describe their experiences of predictive genetic testing for Huntington disease (HD) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Individuals' experiences of, and responses to, a negative genetic test result for familial hypercholesterolaemia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using the common sense model to understand perceived cancer risk in individuals testing for BRCA1/2 mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences of predictive genetic testing in inherited motor neuron disease: Findings from a qualitative interview studySemantic proximity Read ↗

What can we Learn from Patients' Ethical Thinking about the right 'not to know' in Genomics? Lessons from Cancer Genetic Testing for Genetic Counselling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comprehension of cancer risk one and 12 months after predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The nuanced negative: Meanings of a negative diagnostic result in clinical exome sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.