Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Should we ignore dimensional risk factors in prevention of schizophrenia? Signposts to prevention.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry - 1 Nov 2000

McConaghy N

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to outline the development of the concept of allusive thinking as a genetic marker of predisposition to schizophrenia and relate this to other cognitive markers of this predisposition. METHOD: Publications were reviewed which were considered relevant to the objective. RESULTS: Allusive thinking as detected clinically could be measured objectively from subjects' performance on an...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Markers
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Share to Genetic Testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Neuropsychological Tests

Share to Predictive Value of Tests

Share to Risk Factors

Share to Schizophrenia

Share to Schizophrenic Psychology

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11129312
DOI: 10.1080/000486700218

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Should we ignore dimensional risk factors in prevention of schizophrenia? Signposts to prevention.PMID 11129312Read ↗

Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses-a general population study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Social cognition and neurocognition as independent domains in psychosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Is there any point in detecting high risk factors prior to a first psychosis?].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cognitive alterations in groups at risk for psychosis: neutral markers of genetic risk or indicators of social disability?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The silent side of the spectrum: schizotypy and the schizotaxic self.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Thinking within the spectrum: schizophrenic thought disorder in six Danish pedigreesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Single indicator of risk for schizophrenia: probable fact or likely myth?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of vulnerability among first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Vulnerability to schizophrenia. I: Familial nature of of neuropsychologic indicators].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic accuracy and linkage analysis: how useful are schizophrenia spectrum phenotypes?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The validity of Psychosis Proneness Scales as vulnerability indicators in recent-onset schizophrenia patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sustained attention deficits in relation to psychometrically identified schizotypy: evaluating a potential endophenotypic marker.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.