Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.

1 Apr 1999

Abstract excerpt

AIMS: To compare the performance of seven commercial yeast identification methods with that of a reference method, and to compare the costs of the commercial kits. METHODS: Clinical yeast isolates (n = 52), comprising 19 species, were identified using Vitek, Api ID 32C, Api 20C AUX, Yeast Star, Auxacolor, RapID Yeast Plus system, and Api Candida and compared with a reference method which employed conventional...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Share to Nail Diseases and Treatments
Share to Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 10474518
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.52.4.271

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.PMID 10474518Read ↗

Comparison of the API Candida System with the AUXACOLOR System for Identification of Common Yeast PathogensSemantic proximity Read ↗

Candida albicans identification: comparison among nine phenotypic systems and a multiplex PCR.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the BD Phoenix system for identification of a wide spectrum of clinically important yeast species: a comparison with Vitek 2-YSTSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis with commercial yeast identification systems.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of Candida species in the clinical laboratory: a review of conventional, commercial, and molecular techniques.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Rapid Identification of Yeasts and Yeast-Like OrganismsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX, MALDI-TOF MS, and rDNA Sequencing for a Wide Range of Clinically Isolated Yeast Species: Improved Identification by Combining 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX as an Alternative Strategy for Developing CountriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systemsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Yeast identification--past, present, and future methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of Candida dubliniensis in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Epidemiology of yeast species causing bloodstream infection in Tehran, Iran (2015–2017); superiority of 21-plex PCR over the Vitek 2 system for yeast identificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility profile of yeast from vulvovaginal candidiasisSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.