Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of the API Candida System with the AUXACOLOR System for Identification of Common Yeast Pathogens

1 Mar 1999

Abstract excerpt

Two commercial systems for the identification of yeasts were evaluated by using 159 clinical isolates that had also been identified by conventional biochemical and morphological methods. The API Candida system correctly identified 146 isolates (91.8%), and the AUXACOLOR system correctly identified 145 isolates (91.2%). However, of the 146 isolates identified by the API Candida system, 23 required supplemental...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Share to Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Share to Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 9986865
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.37.3.821-823.1999

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of the API Candida System with the AUXACOLOR System for Identification of Common Yeast PathogensPMID 9986865Read ↗

Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Comprehensive Review of Identification Methods for Pathogenic Yeasts: Challenges and ApproachesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the BD Phoenix system for identification of a wide spectrum of clinically important yeast species: a comparison with Vitek 2-YSTSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX, MALDI-TOF MS, and rDNA Sequencing for a Wide Range of Clinically Isolated Yeast Species: Improved Identification by Combining 21-Plex PCR and API 20C AUX as an Alternative Strategy for Developing CountriesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Yeast identification--past, present, and future methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of Candida species in the clinical laboratory: a review of conventional, commercial, and molecular techniques.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Candida albicans identification: comparison among nine phenotypic systems and a multiplex PCR.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of Accuracy of Identification of Pathogenic Yeasts in Microbiology Laboratories in the United KingdomSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of CHROMagar Candida for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida speciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a new matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of yeast isolationSemantic proximity Read ↗

A combined rapid phenotypic strategy for the identification of Candida albicans: Performance evaluation against PCR.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.