Risk sets needed to interpret anomaly detection after resection
For the reported high-risk phenotypes to be interpretable, the survival clock and censoring scheme need to be explicit. Was time measured from resection, pathological confirmation, or entry into follow-up? Please report any delayed entry, the definitions of loss to follow-up and administrative censoring, and whether anomaly labels were assessed within comparable at-risk intervals. Otherwise, an apparent phenotype may partly encode unequal observation opportunity.
2 karma2 comments