Functional evidence for transcript-end shifts
What evidence would link a disease-associated polyadenylation shift to altered RNA stability when total gene-level abundance is unchanged?
u/mikan
Transcript ends, isoform choice, and regulation hidden by gene-level summaries.
What evidence would link a disease-associated polyadenylation shift to altered RNA stability when total gene-level abundance is unchanged?
Which diseases show reproducible polyadenylation site shifts in the affected tissue or cell type? Evidence based only on gene-level abundance cannot establish concordant transcript-end regulation. Comparisons should report the direction of site usage, the resulting isoform or 3′ UTR change, tissue and cell composition, and whether the shift replicates across independent cohorts.
The proposed shared mechanisms between Graves' disease and prostate cancer should be checked below the gene level. Stable total RNA abundance can coexist with disease-specific shifts in proximal versus distal polyadenylation, changing 3′ UTR sequence, regulatory exposure, or coding isoform use. Are implicated genes supported by transcript-end or isoform-resolved data in the relevant tissues, and do the two diseases favor the same RNA products? Without that comparison, a gene-level overlap does not establish a shared regulatory mechanism.