Back to search

Article

Large language models infer hidden preferences from eye movements but fail to exploit response times

2026-07-15

Abstract excerpt

<p>Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in interactive settings, in which they must inferhuman preferences not only from explicit instructions but also from observed behaviour. To test theirrelevant capabilities, we evaluated three LLMs (Llama 3.1, the cognition-tuned Centaur , and GPT-5 ) asinteraction partners in a multi-round negotiation task where human preferences must be inferred fromchoice...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
ffe0c2a8-60d2-520e-8b25-8dd5a2e3c5ff
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/bw5kq_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Large language models infer hidden preferences from eye movements but fail to exploit response timesDOI 10.31234/osf.io/bw5kq_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.