Back to search

Article

The GRACE Treatment-Selection Paradox in Real-World Non-ST- Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Comorbidity Burden, Invasive Management, and Medication Persistence

2026-08-03

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background In real-world non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), patients with the highest predicted ischemic risk may not uniformly undergo invasive management because of comorbidity burden, frailty, bleeding risk, and perceived procedural futility influence treatment selection. Methods We analyzed 1,461 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS from the Taiwan ACS Full-Spectru...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
f4d9c9d2-7a7a-583c-8a39-b00ab7ea4d51
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10297524/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The GRACE Treatment-Selection Paradox in Real-World Non-ST- Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Comorbidity Burden, Invasive Management, and Medication PersistenceDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10297524/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.