Back to search

Article

Evaluating Methods for Assessing LLM-Translated Clinical Discharge Instructions: A Comparison of Automated Metrics, MQM-Based Evaluation, and Clinician Review

2026-08-22

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for translating patient-facing clinical communication, yet robust methods for evaluating translation quality remain lacking. Existing evaluation approaches, including automated metrics, structured quality frameworks, and clinician review, capture different aspects of translation quality, but their agreement and com...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
f34d3fb4-bd84-5b3d-987f-63e50ba4b0e9
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10631294/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Evaluating Methods for Assessing LLM-Translated Clinical Discharge Instructions: A Comparison of Automated Metrics, MQM-Based Evaluation, and Clinician ReviewDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10631294/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.