Article

Conservation professionals' views on governing for coexistence with large carnivores

2020-08-01

Abstract excerpt

Decision-making about large carnivores is complex and controversial, and processes vary from deliberation and expert analysis to ballot boxes and courtrooms. Decision-makers range from neighboring landowners to the United Nations. Efficacy, longevity and legitimacy of policies may often depend as much on process as the policy itself. Overcoming controversy requires greater understanding of preferences for decision...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: f127cc09-372f-5720-8de9-287b6a0fa98a
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108668

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Conservation professionals' views on governing for coexistence with large carnivoresDOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108668Read

The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflictsSemantic proximity Read

(Un)sustainable Wildlife ConservationSemantic proximity Read

Just preservationSemantic proximity Read

Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: A review of research about the Natura 2000 networkSemantic proximity Read

A systematic map of human-carnivore coexistenceSemantic proximity Read

Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of wolf, lynx and fox in a Dutch riverine areaSemantic proximity Read

Every case is different: Cautionary insights about generalisations in human-wildlife conflict from a range-wide study of people and jaguarsSemantic proximity Read

Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservationSemantic proximity Read

Assessing the ecosystem services and disservices provided by migratory wildlife across the Greater Yellowstone EcosystemSemantic proximity Read

Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humansSemantic proximity Read

Failures to disagree' is essential for environmental science to effectively influence policy development.Semantic proximity Read

Political common ground on preserving nature: Environmental motives across the political spectrum.Semantic proximity Read