Back to search

Article

Comparative Evaluation of SHAP and LIME for Clinical Interpretability in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Mortality Prediction Models

2025-12-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Aims Despite their strong predictive performance, complex machine learning (ML) models are often criticized for their lack of interpretability, especially in high-stakes clinical settings. This study aims to compare two leading explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods—SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME)—when applied to...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
f100e2b1-d09f-5596-bec8-41e3a88119d4
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-7793831/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparative Evaluation of SHAP and LIME for Clinical Interpretability in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Mortality Prediction ModelsDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7793831/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.