Back to search

Article

Clinical efficacy of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer compared with abdominoperineal resection: a single-center retrospective study

2020-05-13

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Purpose: </h4> In recent years, intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been increasingly used to replace abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancer. This study was to compare the clinical efficacy of ISR and APR. Methods Between 2012 and 2018, 74 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer underwent ISR and APR in our medical centre. The outcomes were retrospectively studied and compared. Results A...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
ee6e8219-c5de-557c-92ce-c0d49d5bed12
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-26040/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Clinical efficacy of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer compared with abdominoperineal resection: a single-center retrospective studyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-26040/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.