Back to search

Article

Can metaphyseal variations in the distal femurs and proximal tibias be distinguished from classic metaphyseal lesions?

2025-06-17

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background: </bold>Classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are considered specific for child abuse, but the reliability of radiologists in distinguishing CMLs from metaphyseal variations is unclear. <bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate whether radiologists can differentiate between CMLs and metaphyseal variations in the knees. <bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>We performed a<bold> </b...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
eb61f074-1db7-5c24-96ff-8c4b07d46fa6
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-6831876/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Can metaphyseal variations in the distal femurs and proximal tibias be distinguished from classic metaphyseal lesions?DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6831876/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.