Article

Zooming in on what counts as core and auxiliary: A case study on recognition models of visual working-memory

2022-09-09

Abstract excerpt

<p>Research on best practices in theory assessment highlights that testing theories is challenging because they inherit a new set of auxiliary assumptions as soon as they are linked to a specific methodology. In this article, we integrate and build on this line of work by demonstrating the breadth of these challenges. In particular, we show that tracking auxiliary assumptions is difficult because they are made at...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: ea187224-3c89-502b-b3b2-211890901efc
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7an3x

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Zooming in on what counts as core and auxiliary: A case study on recognition models of visual working-memoryDOI 10.31234/osf.io/7an3xRead

Scaling models of visual working memory to natural imagesSemantic proximity Read

Is working memory domain-general or domain-specific? Implications for theory and practiceSemantic proximity Read

Representational geometry explains puzzling error distributions in behavioral tasksSemantic proximity Read

No Coincidence, George: Capacity Limits in Cognitive Processing Reflect the Curse of GeneralizationSemantic proximity Read

Task-relevant representational spaces in human memory tracesSemantic proximity Read

A framework for computational models of human memorySemantic proximity Read

Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memorySemantic proximity Read

Capacity Limits in Cognitive Processing Reflect the Curse of GeneralizationSemantic proximity Read

Predicting visual working memory errors with a priori measures of representational geometry from human and artificial systemsSemantic proximity Read