Back to search

Article

No Single Model Fits All: Conflict Decision-Making Models Vary More Across Datasets Than Across Tasks

2026-08-06

Abstract excerpt

<p>Conflict variants of evidence accumulation models are widely used to explain human cognitive control. However, the generalizability of these models is largely unknown because of the lack of systematic comparisons across multiple conflict tasks and multiple datasets. Here, using a unified amortized Bayesian inference (ABI) framework, we compare the standard DDM and three conflict-specific variants across a bench...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
df63921d-92c0-504d-921e-7945200958cf
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/y9rx4_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
No Single Model Fits All: Conflict Decision-Making Models Vary More Across Datasets Than Across TasksDOI 10.31234/osf.io/y9rx4_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.