Back to search

Article

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center cohort study

2025-03-11

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Minimally invasive techniques have become the standard of care for treating rectal prolapse through a transabdominal approach. However, there is limited data comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches in terms of long-term recurrence and reoperation rate. This study aimed at comparing the perioperative and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted rectopexy versus conven...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
d392dcfa-3ec9-5477-9ff9-b355e52e3735
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-6120662/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center cohort studyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6120662/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.