Back to search

Article

A Blinded Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and AI-Generated Responses to Otologic Patient Queries

2026-04-15

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Objective</h4> The objective of this study is to assess the quality, empathy, and readability of large language model (LLM) responses regarding otologic questions from patients as they compare to verified physician responses in other patient-driven forums. This study aims to predict the potential utility of LLMs in patient-centered communication. <h4>Study Design</h4> Comparative study <h4...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
d2d7dcf5-f453-5ffd-9b60-d6986ed72fb6
DOI
10.64898/2026.04.14.26350677
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Blinded Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and AI-Generated Responses to Otologic Patient QueriesDOI 10.64898/2026.04.14.26350677
Physician Evaluations of Large Language Model-Generated Responses to Medical Questions by Region and Years in Practice: A preliminary studySemantic proximity
Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models against the NHS 111 Online Triaging for Emergency OphthalmologySemantic proximity
Benchmarking the Performance of Large Language Models in Uveitis: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, Google Gemini, and Anthropic Claude3Semantic proximity
Multidimensional Evaluation of Large Language Models on the AAP In-Service Examination: Assessing Accuracy, Calibration, and Citation ReliabilitySemantic proximity
neuroGPT-X: Towards an Accountable Expert Opinion Tool for Vestibular SchwannomaSemantic proximity
GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 responses to common migraine questions: a cross-sectional comparative study of accuracy, completeness, empathy, readability and safetySemantic proximity
Evaluating ChatGPT-4o’s Web-Enhanced Responses in Patient Education: Ankle Stabilization Surgery as a Case StudySemantic proximity
Evaluating General-Purpose LLMs for Patient-Facing Use: Dermatology-Centered Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisSemantic proximity
ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0: A Head to Head Comparison in Generating Pharyngitis Patient GuidesSemantic proximity
Comparative Performance of General-Purpose Large Language Models and a Specialized Clinical AI Tool on OKAP-Style Ophthalmology QuestionsSemantic proximity
How easily can AI chatbots spread misinformation in audiology and otolaryngology?Semantic proximity
Clinical Safety of Large Language Models in Oral Cancer–Related Patient Communication: A Longitudinal StudySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.