Back to search

Article

A 3-Minute Education on the False Positive Paradox Improves Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Intracranial Aneurysm Detection: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Reader Study

2026-08-28

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> Even a highly accurate diagnostic test can yield more false-positive than true-positive findings in low-prevalence settings, which is known as the false positive paradox. Radiologists' unawareness of this paradox may foster automation bias, the tendency to excessively rely on AI outputs. Methods In this prospective, multinational, randomized controlled reader study (DRKS00038740), 34 readers...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
ced4773a-692c-5374-95c2-b3086e8742c4
DOI
10.64898/2026.08.25.26361324
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A 3-Minute Education on the False Positive Paradox Improves Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Intracranial Aneurysm Detection: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Reader StudyDOI 10.64898/2026.08.25.26361324
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.