Back to search

Article

Misleading AI guidance in psychological publishing

2026-01-06

Abstract excerpt

<p>In response to generative AI, SAGE, the Association for Psychological Science (APS), and the American Psychological Association (APA) have introduced policies to regulate its use in their journals. These policies share sensible aims—protecting confidentiality, preventing fabrication and plagiarism, preserving human accountability—but they also embed strong claims about large language models (LLMs). Such claims—...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
c9ce9593-64e9-5807-aa5f-801909e2e638
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/k6cyt_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Misleading AI guidance in psychological publishingDOI 10.31234/osf.io/k6cyt_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.