Article

Mistakes can stabilise the dynamics of rock-paper-scissors games

2020-12-02

Abstract excerpt

A game of rock-paper-scissors is an interesting example of an interaction where none of the pure strategies strictly dominates all others, leading to a cyclic pattern. In this work, we consider an unstable version of rock-paper-scissors dynamics and allow individuals to make behavioural mistakes during the strategy execution. We show that such an assumption can break a cyclic relationship leading to a stable equil...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: c391737b-3830-53af-ba21-a8acfc9f27ec
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.02.407957

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Mistakes can stabilise the dynamics of rock-paper-scissors gamesDOI 10.1101/2020.12.02.407957Read

Rock-scissors-paper and the survival of the weakest.Semantic proximity Read

Oscillatory dynamics in rock-paper-scissors games with mutations.Semantic proximity Read

Why is cyclic dominance so rare?Semantic proximity Read

The joker effect: cooperation driven by destructive agents.Semantic proximity Read

Metapopulation model for rock-paper-scissors game: Mutation affects paradoxical impacts.Semantic proximity Read

Successful strategies in the voluntarily repeated Prisoner’s DilemmaSemantic proximity Read

Trade-off shapes diversity in eco-evolutionary dynamics.Semantic proximity Read

Strategy diversity stabilizes mutualism through investment cycles, phase polymorphism, and spatial bubbles.Semantic proximity Read

Demographic noise slows down cycles of dominance.Semantic proximity Read

Purely competitive evolutionary dynamics for games.Semantic proximity Read

Evolutionary stability in continuous nonlinear public goods games.Semantic proximity Read

Games of multicellularity.Semantic proximity Read