Back to search

Article

“What’s in a name?”: Using mpox as a case study to understand the importance of communication, advocacy, and information accuracy in disease nomenclature

2024-06-25

Abstract excerpt

Historically, many diseases have been named after the species or location of discovery, the discovering scientists, or the most impacted population. However, species-specific disease names often misrepresent the true reservoir; location-based disease names are frequently targeted with xenophobia; some of the discovering scientists have darker histories; and impacted populations have been stigmatized for this assoc...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
c0dabe11-0db4-5568-a6b7-12aa8cce5e86
DOI
10.1101/2024.06.24.24309420
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
“What’s in a name?”: Using mpox as a case study to understand the importance of communication, advocacy, and information accuracy in disease nomenclatureDOI 10.1101/2024.06.24.24309420
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.