Back to search

Article

How Objective Source and Subjective Belief Shape the Detectability and Acceptability of LLMs’ Moral Judgments

2024-10-01

Abstract excerpt

<p>As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into decision-making systems—such as autonomous vehicles and medical devices—understanding how humans perceive and evaluate AI-generated judgements is crucial. To investigate this, we conducted a series of experiments in which participants evaluated justifications for moral and non-moral choices, generated either by humans or LLMs. Participants attempt...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
c02fced0-e04f-5036-a0ad-e2cb17f7ea2f
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/ct6rx_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
How Objective Source and Subjective Belief Shape the Detectability and Acceptability of LLMs’ Moral JudgmentsDOI 10.31234/osf.io/ct6rx_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.