Back to search

Article

Comparing opportunistic and systematic sampling methods for non-invasive genetic monitoring of a small translocated brown bear population

2010-02-01

Abstract excerpt

1. Non-invasive genetic sampling (NGS) of hair and faeces has become an important tool for monitoring wildlife populations, but many managers question the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of these methods for long-term monitoring. To address this question, more studies are needed that simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of multiple NGS designs in the same study area. 2. In 2003-2004, we carr...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
be6dcf5e-c9f2-537b-8996-98decf566294
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01752.x
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparing opportunistic and systematic sampling methods for non-invasive genetic monitoring of a small translocated brown bear populationDOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01752.x
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.