Back to search

Article

Deciding when to decide: How recency, urgency, risk, and bias shape human sequential decision-making: A case study across the obsessive-compulsive spectrum

2026-08-25

Abstract excerpt

Deciding when to stop gathering information and commit to a choice is a fundamental challenge in decision-making under uncertainty. Normative characterizations such as Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) prescribe mathematically optimal stopping rules; however, human evidence gathering systematically departs from optimality. Pathological departures -- such as the excessive indecisiveness charac...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
bdd3b3c2-0e81-5545-9007-cccee11bc90a
DOI
10.64898/2026.08.21.746184
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Deciding when to decide: How recency, urgency, risk, and bias shape human sequential decision-making: A case study across the obsessive-compulsive spectrumDOI 10.64898/2026.08.21.746184
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.