Article

Decision making in slow and rapid reaching: Sacrificing success to minimize effort

2019-09-17

Abstract excerpt

<p>Current studies on visuomotor decision making come to inconsistent conclusions regarding the optimality with which these decisions are made. When executing rapid reaching movements under uncertainty, humans seem to automatically select optimal movement paths that take into account the position of all potential targets (spatial averaging). In contrast, humans rarely employ optimal strategies when making decision...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: bc695644-3d10-51e2-ad79-a21f81d4bfbc
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/9w6jp

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Decision making in slow and rapid reaching: Sacrificing success to minimize effortDOI 10.31234/osf.io/9w6jpRead

An integrative computational approach for obstacle avoidance during action selectionSemantic proximity Read

Motor planning under uncertaintySemantic proximity Read

Biomechanical Costs Influence Decisions Made During Ongoing ActionsSemantic proximity Read

A Linear Threshold Model for Optimal Stopping BehaviorSemantic proximity Read

Risk optimization during ongoing movement: Insights from movement and gaze behavior in throwingSemantic proximity Read

Naturalistic actions modulate Working Memory prioritization in immersive virtual realitySemantic proximity Read

A weighted constraint satisfaction approach to human goal-directed decision makingSemantic proximity Read

Optimizing motor decision-making through competition with opponentsSemantic proximity Read

Proprioceptive and visual feedback responses in macaques exploit goal redundancySemantic proximity Read

An “Aha!” moment precedes the strategic response to a visuomotor rotationSemantic proximity Read

Reward invigorates isometric gripping actionsSemantic proximity Read

Rapid eye and hand responses in an interception task are differentially modulated by context-dependent predictabilitySemantic proximity Read