Back to search

Article

Generative AI systems conflate two distinct pregnancy-dating algorithms

2026-07-08

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Generative AI is increasingly used for clinical calculations yet may recite one method while computing another. Using pregnancy dating as a deterministic test case, we compared Naegele’s calendar rule with the fixed 280-day count: across all 78,163 last-menstrual-period dates (1812–2025) they diverged in 55.7% of cases and in every leap-day interval. Auditing five AI systems, three misl...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
bbc3a1c9-ccb6-536c-8156-e7924e2561f9
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10270390/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Generative AI systems conflate two distinct pregnancy-dating algorithmsDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10270390/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.