Back to search

Article

Evaluating Large Language Model Diagnostic Performance on JAMA Clinical Challenges via a Multi-Agent Conversational Framework

2025-08-24

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background & Objective</h4> Standard clinical LLM benchmarks use multiple-choice vignettes that present all information up front, unlike real encounters where clinicians iteratively elicit histories and objective data. We hypothesized that such formats inflate LLM performance and mask weaknesses in diagnostic reasoning. We developed and evaluated a multi-AI agent conversational framework that converts JAMA Cl...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b59a3ee6-ffc7-512e-ae0a-4bde3c7b6691
DOI
10.1101/2025.08.20.25334087
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Evaluating Large Language Model Diagnostic Performance on JAMA Clinical Challenges via a Multi-Agent Conversational FrameworkDOI 10.1101/2025.08.20.25334087
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.