Back to search

Article

Inpatient or outpatient occupational rehabilitation – what works best for whom? A non-randomized clinical trial

2025-09-08

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Purpose This study compared return to work (RTW) outcomes among Norwegian patients with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders participating in a 4-week inpatient or 3-month outpatient occupational rehabilitation program to examine how program type and pre-intervention sick-leave history influenced RTW. Methods An observational cohort design that included 857 participants, categoriz...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b1b11613-eb63-5ff6-bcce-072910e15ab4
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-7452187/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Inpatient or outpatient occupational rehabilitation – what works best for whom? A non-randomized clinical trialDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7452187/v1
Does employer involvement in primary health care enhance return to work for patients with stress-related mental disorders? a cluster randomized controlled trialSemantic proximity
Effects of a vocational rehabilitation programme on return to work among sick-listed primary health care patients A population-based matched, case-control studySemantic proximity
A systematic review of evidence on the effectiveness and health impacts of interventions to promote employment rates among people with chronic illness and disability in the UK and Ireland between 2003 and 2023Semantic proximity
Protocol for the Work And Vocational advicE (WAVE) randomised controlled trial testing the addition of vocational advice to usual primary care (Clinical Trials: NCT04543097)Semantic proximity
What is the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of at-home time-limited reablement service for improving an individual’s independence and health outcomes and reducing the need for long term care: a rapid reviewSemantic proximity
Do non-clinical services help to improve functional outcomes among young adults with mental disorders? A systematic review.Semantic proximity
Pushing occupational rehabilitation – Implementation of a therapy diary in the outpatient aftercare of psychosomatic rehabilitation may promote the occupational reintegration process: A survey of therapists and patients.Semantic proximity
SWOT analysis of an outpatient rehabilitation physical activity intervention for individuals with mild traumatic brain injurySemantic proximity
Welfare benefit utilization for people with functional somatic disorder. A population-based cohort studySemantic proximity
Study protocol for a pragmatic cluster RCT on the effect and cost-effectiveness of Everyday Life Rehabilitation versus treatment as usual for persons with severe psychiatric disability living in sheltered or supported housing facilitiesSemantic proximity
Health Service Use of Australian Unemployment and Disability Benefit Recipients: A National, Cross-Sectional Study.Semantic proximity
Interprofessional homebased reablement intervention for older adults in Sweden: A randomized controlled trialSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.