Back to search

Article

Cost-effectiveness of an app-based treatment for urinary incontinence in comparison to care as usual in general practice: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 12 months

2021-02-14

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective: </h4> Long-term cost-effectiveness of app-based treatment for female stress, urgency, or mixed urinary incontinence (UI) compared to care-as-usual in primary care. <h4>Design:</h4> A pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial. <h4>Setting:</h4> Primary care in the Netherlands from 2015 to 2018, follow-up at 12 months. Population: Women with ≥2 UI-episodes per week, access to mobile apps, wa...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
ac107b2a-7810-5be2-a042-f3d14dbb8ee7
DOI
10.22541/au.161330881.15636474/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Cost-effectiveness of an app-based treatment for urinary incontinence in comparison to care as usual in general practice: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 12 monthsDOI 10.22541/au.161330881.15636474/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.