Back to search

Article

Task-Conditional Accuracy–Support Trade-offs of Sparse Attention Normalizers in Compact Classifiers

2026-08-18

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Purpose: Sparse alternatives to softmax can reduce attention support, but their value in compact classifiers may depend on the task and implementation. This study tests whether fixed and adaptive sparse normalizers improve predictive quality under a shared compact-classifier protocol. <h4>Methods:</h4> Dense softmax, sparsemax, entmax-1.5, three fixed-ratio top-k softmax settings, and h...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
aa953712-375f-5ad8-8992-965d1f393458
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10720877/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Task-Conditional Accuracy–Support Trade-offs of Sparse Attention Normalizers in Compact ClassifiersDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10720877/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.