Back to search

Article

Learning to read does not compete with face and object recognition

2019-11-15

Abstract excerpt

<p>Human cultural inventions, such as written language, are far too recent for dedicated neural infrastructure to have evolved in its service. Culturally newly acquired skills (e.g. reading) thus ‘recycle’ evolutionarily older circuits that originally evolved for different, but similar functions (e.g. visual object recognition). The destructive competition hypothesis predicts that this neuronal recycling has detri...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
aa2855ba-c176-5026-bc78-1c5d180e9a28
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/qzwhj
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Learning to read does not compete with face and object recognitionDOI 10.31234/osf.io/qzwhj
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.