Article

Aligned but Biased: Comparing Human and Large Language Model Intergroup Bias

2026-08-16

Abstract excerpt

<p>Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate people in domains such as hiring, education, and housing. A central concern is whether these systems reproduce human intergroup bias, reduce it, or express it in new forms. Here, we compare human and LLM bias using matched stereotype, decision, and text-evaluation tasks. We fielded a nationally representative Danish survey (N = 1,000), administered...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Uncategorized literature

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: a92387d7-2697-5760-a15b-ede39505e91b
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/tyjcs_v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Aligned but Biased: Comparing Human and Large Language Model Intergroup BiasDOI 10.31234/osf.io/tyjcs_v1Read

Multimodal large language models encode implicit gender biasSemantic proximity Read

Modelling Implicit Bias in Gender–Career Associations: A systematic comparison of language modelsSemantic proximity Read

Large language models as linguistic simulators and cognitive models in human researchSemantic proximity Read

Large Language Model–Generated Tutoring Responses Receive Higher Ratings but Are Penalized by Source-Based Evaluation BiasSemantic proximity Read

Stereotypical Bias Amplification, and Reversal, in an Experimental Model of Human Interaction with Generative AISemantic proximity Read

Quantifying and Mitigating Gender Bias in Legal Large Language Models:A Counterfactual Fairness FrameworkSemantic proximity Read

Which Humans?Semantic proximity Read

AI Language Model Rivals Expert Ethicist in Perceived Moral ExpertiseSemantic proximity Read