Back to search

Article

Flow-driver-generated synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation versus biphasic positive airway pressure after extubation in preterm infants

2025-06-18

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective: </h4> To compare the efficacy and safety of flow-driver-generated synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) and biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) after extubation in preterm infants. Hypothesis: SNIPPV delivered via a flow-driver device improves post-extubation outcomes compared with non-synchronized BiPAP. Study Design: This single-center, retrospective, obser...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a12253a8-e510-5ea1-83ff-dd429d339f21
DOI
10.22541/au.175025363.39607363/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Flow-driver-generated synchronized nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation versus biphasic positive airway pressure after extubation in preterm infantsDOI 10.22541/au.175025363.39607363/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.