Back to search

Article

Assessment of the credibility of generative artificial intelligence large language models on nutritional guidelines for orthodontic patients

2025-06-30

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background To evaluate the credibility of large language models (LLMs) compared to American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) and British Orthodontic Society (BOS) guides regarding nutritional guidelines for orthodontic patients. Methods The responses offered by ChatGPT 4.0, Copilot and Gemini were assessed for information credibility about tooth decay, food, beverages, oral care, an...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
9eba66c4-f41a-58fd-9874-ea2480acaf0f
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-6792273/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Assessment of the credibility of generative artificial intelligence large language models on nutritional guidelines for orthodontic patientsDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6792273/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.